On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 22:37:36 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > Regarding the ongoing maintenance, I'm quite attracted to the idea > of accepting it for maintenance by the darcs team, but with a > somehow lower status than darcs itself.
+1 on that > Rather than having a single > darcs-contrib bucket for such things, I'd suggest it just be a > separate package on hackage of its own. And that > I'm also in no rush to add the loose coupling to darcs itself that you > suggest, because I'd prefer it to be clearly separate. We could also think of the separation as being a really good opportunity for us to improve the Darcs library. Or maybe to develop a style of working on new features where we let them stand alone for a little while (incubation phase) and then fold them into Darcs as it becomes clear how important they are and how to fit them in. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
