On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 14:51:16 +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: > > I just saw the disjointed thread about this in Gmane, but I can't find a > > description of what's actually proposed for annotate. Could someone > > point me at it (e.g. as a message id, if it was posted here)?
See also http://bugs.darcs.net/issue25 Unfortunately, I had not done a good job of making it clear that the proposed git-blame style UI was the proposed way of going forward. I don't have particularly strong feelings anyway, just as long as we have good reasons for picking what we finally go with. I would add that the important thing is that we do the work, which is what Petr did. Many times, UIs have to be designed from the top-down, but here, I think we have the luxury of going from the bottom up. So we can continue to discuss this at a leisurely pace and hopefully come to an agreement over time, with a working draft proposal along the way. It's how we got the hunk editor working and I think most people are happy with the result, right? Folks who would like to weigh in are more than welcome -- we need your perspective -- but please and take take stock of what has already been said to help us avoid going around in circles. A nice contribution would be to summarise the key points of the discussion so far. Thanks, -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:ko...@jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
