On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 19:17:27 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > should be possible. I am a bit uneasy about race conditions (e.g. a > patch is pushed to screened and also to darcs.net/ between two > darcswatch runs). Can status updates to roundup be conditional, i.e. a > mail saying „if the patch has status needs-screening, set it to > needs-review, otherwise do nothing“?
I'm not sure, but I think what we'd have to do is to write what roundup calls an auditor (which is a like a detector, only it acts as a prehook rather than a posthook). We actually also could use something like this for the resolved-in setting, because our roundup-darcs integration script will say something like "This issue has been resolved in Darcs 2.8 HEAD" without noticing that somebody had already marked it resolved-in Darcs 2.5 CURRENT first. So there needs to be an auditor that says "if the actor is a bot and the current resolved-in is earlier than than the proposed one, don't change the resolved-in field". -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:ko...@jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
