On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 08:10:40 +0000, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Quick screening question. Wouldn't it be simpler for subusage > > to have access to the result of System.Environment.getProgramName? > > no, because > a) It is in IO
I was going to say "what if it accepted just a String argument?" but I imagine you already thought of that and decided that there are uses of subusage which are far enough from IO that feeding it getProgramName would be problematic. > b) There might be reasons to toss around commands for other programs. > Assume you would, for some reason, have a suite of darcs related > programs, and want to generate manpages for all of them in one place. > Then being able to handle DarcsCommands of different executables would > help. Not particularly convinced, but I'm going to accept this patch anyway. Thanks! -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:ko...@jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
