Eric Kow <b...@darcs.net> writes: > In light of postponed adventure: > > *********************************************************************** > _______ Sorry for the wait! The repository you are fetching is > | | using the DEPRECATED 'old-fashioned' format. I'm getting a > | O O | hashed copy instead, but this may take a while. > | ___ | > | / \ | The hashed format requires a Darcs 2 client, but is otherwise > |_______| compatible with existing old-fashioned branches. > > We recommend that the maintainer upgrade the remote copy to > hashed as soon as possible. When we have retire old-fashioned have retire --> have retired? or just retire?
> repositories for good, Darcs will still do in place upgrading in place --> in-place? > for old-fashioned repositories but provide no other support, > not even darcs get. I would avoid explicit mention of darcs get here. You save a line and it also seems that supporting get+pull may be only couple lines of code in addition to what you need for --upgrade. Yours, Petr. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
