Be sure nobody will use Darcs seriously until Darcs solve its performance issues. You could create a hundred of free Darcs hosting sites, even much more featured than Github, you could either offer 1€ per record... but nobody will use a CVS that is unusable for large repos (and even for some medium size ones).
I have never use bzr so I don't know how slow it is, but one thing is to be "slower", and another very different thing is to be "irritating". And "irritating" is what most people think about Darcs when talking about performance. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Gour <g...@atmarama.net> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:43:54 +0200 > >>>>>> "Yitzchak" == Yitzchak Gale <g...@sefer.org> wrote: > > Yitzchak> For industrial users at least, hosting is not the issue. > Yitzchak> Though if that affects adoption in the FOSS world, I > Yitzchak> suppose it will also indirectly affect adoption in the > Yitzchak> industrial world. > > Right. People like to use the tools they are accustomed to. > > For (many) industrial users it's not so important since many use > commercial tools either, but if there is question to migrate to > open-source DVCS, the tools used by open-source enthusiasts will be > recommended. > > I'm sure explosion of Github is not just due to Git itself. > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > > Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > darcs-users mailing list > darcs-users@darcs.net > http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users > > -- Iago Abal Rivas
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
