Eric Kow writes: > I think four things have changed since Petr introduced release > branches. > > - core team maintains HEAD, not one person (not sure if this came > before or after, but it may be a factor to consider) > - more relaxed push rules (trivial or peripheral things need not > be reviewed) > - core team pushes directly to release branch, with policy about > what to push > http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2010-June/024284.html > - better infrastructure/automation for doing releases (thank you > Petr and Reinier?) > > Maybe these things make the conditions for release on HEAD a bit > better?
I think all of those things are minuses for QA, except maybe infrastructure (if P & R are particularly anal-compulsive about adding QA features to release infrastructure, it could be a plus, but automation per se tends to make it easier to overlook regressions), and therefore make conditions for a HEAD release *worse*, not better. IMHO YMMV YouWontKnowUntilYouTry, etc. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
