On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 20:34:44 +0200, Dan Pascu wrote: > I think some of them may benefit from a review and some adjusting. > Those that describe a negated action should use --dont-something > when something is an actiob. In my example --no-set-default could > benefit from that.
Have a look at http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1457 for thoughts on reforming the switches. There's a bigger re-think in the works (with hidden backwards compatibility). Petr has done quite a bit of work to make this sort of thing possible. If we develop more ideas in this thread, we should probably post a summary on the tracker. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:ko...@jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
