Hi Dave,
On 1/13/11 2:25 PM, Dave Love wrote:
http://joyful.com/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=darcsum;a=summary
In fact darcsum should maybe be punting to vc-darcs for various things,
even though vc-darcs hasn't been accepted for Emacs (sigh).
Incidentally, the regexp in the latest darcsum.el patch (Simon Marlow,
Nov 25) is trivially wrong, but the fix I sent hasn't been pushed. It's
in http://www.loveshack.ukfsn.org/darcsum/ and will fix certain darcsum
hangs.
Oops.. something went astray ? The last mail I have from you is subject "extra
darcsum.el patch" on nov 23.
When I pull --dry from your repo above it lists these patches.. should I pull
them to the public repo ?
Wed Nov 23 03:49:50 PST 2005 Dave Love <f...@gnu.org>
* Clean up Gnus stuff -- don't conditionalize the definitions.
Wed Nov 23 06:48:20 PST 2005 Dave Love <f...@gnu.org>
* Rename darcs-mm-view-darcs-patch to darcsum-mm-view-darcs-patch.
Mon Nov 28 07:19:38 PST 2005 Dave Love <f...@gnu.org>
* Abstract process startup into darcsum-start-process. Use TERM=dumb.
Strangely, push --dry to the above repo lists a whole bunch of patches.
Something amiss here.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
