On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:21:57AM +0100, John Lato wrote: > I would like this feature, either as originally proposed or Miles's > alternative (or both...) > Having said that, here's my attempt to play skeptic: > Wouldn't this feature be much less useful if darcs had in-place branching? > The only repos I typically communicate with are a remote-hosted > (publically available) repo and other local repos. With in-place > branching, darcs would be aware of all my local branches, so I would only > ever communicate with one remote repo.
The feature would still be useful if you're working in a multi-person team, or if you have multiple test/deployment servers. Miles -- Before you read this, please understand that I never wanted to write this document, being grossly under-qualified, but I always wanted to read it, and this was the only way. -- Paul ``Rusty'' Russel _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
