On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 22:38:19 +1200, Theam Yong Chew wrote: > During darcs record, I would like the edit to be recorded as 2 hunks, > so using the "interactive editor" (press e, see final output below > [1]), I defined 2 separate operations and then record (press y) the 2 > hunks into 1 patch. Unfortunately, my hints through the interactive > edit have not had any effect because the 2 separate hunks get merged > again.
... > I know it would've required 2 different patches to highlight this, but > often it makes sense to group related hunks into the same patch. This > is probably not a straight-forward thing to resolve, since the merging > behaviour is often the desired behaviour. What do you suggest I try? I believe you're likely out of luck and that the only way to prevent this sort of coalescing is by having two separate patches after all. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:[email protected] (Jabber or Google Talk only)
pgpKqMLZLj7mh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
