On 8 May 2011, at 21:52, Eric Kow wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 21:21:54 +0200, Wolfgang Dobler wrote: >> Now there probably are some reasons for darcs' design, and we certainly >> cannot simply change the default behaviour. But I would like to see a flag >> (that I can put in my ~/.darcs/defaults) giving me git's file name >> handling here: > > Unless there is a very good reason for this to be optional, could we > just switch to the proposed relative-path behaviour? > > Wherever possible, we should aim for sensible behaviour over options.
I think I just detailed in my previous email why absolute paths can be useful. -- Dan _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
