On 15/08/2012 11:52, Benjamin Franksen wrote: > Iago Abal wrote: >> In my opinion you made a very good choice by making -O the default >> behavior of darcs send. I don't see any problem with a command named >> "send" that does not send anything... its purpose is to generate a bundle >> *to be sent*, and it can actually send it automatically if you want. >> >> When I started contributing Darcs I had that problem, and it was >> irritating. I wanted to upload a patch but I didn't have too much time. >> Hence, I "configured" my sendmail and run darcs send... a few days later I >> discovered that my sendmail configuration was wrong and the mail was lost. > > I support the idea that a (auto-named) patch bundle file is created by > default, so it cannot be lost, but I would like darcs to at least try to > send it by default, too. Darcs should do what the command says w/o any extra > configuration; if send no longer sends mail, I would have to add yet another > line to my ~/.darcs/default.
+1 to this idea. I think the idea of darcs send not sending is weird :-) Another thought: automatically CC the user (using ~/.darcs/author) and tell them in the message that if they don't get the email, the intended recipient probably didn't either. Ganesh _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
