To my awareness, the init --no-working and push is currently the best way to do this. Maybe Florent has some better advice?
It's possible that a darcs put --no-working-dir feature would be a good thing. If you'd be kind enough to check http://bugs.darcs.net and perhaps submit the feature, that'd be great. Many thanks, Eric On 10 December 2012 16:00, rnons <remotenonse...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, list > > I have a normal darcs repo with a working directory, now I decide to put > it on remote server. > > If I scp the _darcs directory to remote, then `darcs status` on remote > will show all files as Removed. > > But I don't want to scp the whole working directory to remote. So I think > I need to change it as a bare repo? > > My current approach is `darcs init --no-working-dir` on remote, and then > `darcs push` to remote. > > I'm still curious is there another way to change a normal darcs repo into > a bare repo? > > > rnons > ______________________________**_________________ > darcs-users mailing list > darcs-users@darcs.net > http://lists.osuosl.org/**mailman/listinfo/darcs-users<http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users> > -- Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
