On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <step...@xemacs.org>wrote:
> Ben Franksen writes: > > No problem, as 'darcs get' gives you a new copy of the sources. > > This is slow and requires changing directories to work, not to mention > a "make world" rather than a "make one .o and relink". Here's another data point in favor of multiple branches inside a single directory. Many developers now work in IDEs or similar tools. These tools almost always have a notion of "project" which hardcodes a directory. If switching branches requires switching directories, one must have multiple "projects" and synchronize configuration among them. I rarely work in an IDE and darcs has caused me grief in this respect. I can imagine how IDE-centric developers would feel. -- Michael
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
