---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:59:17 +0000 From: Benedikt Huber <benedikt.hu...@gmail.com> To: Ivan Zakharyaschev <i...@altlinux.org>, haskell-c...@haskell.org Subject: Re: Q: language-c upstream repo
Hi Ivan, the hub.darcs.net repository is a mirror of http://code.haskell.org/language-c (the official upstream) that was created to simplify contributing. Conversion to darcs-2 was not straightforward IIRC, and the update of the repository did not work out.That's why code.haskell.org is still darcs-1. Best, Benedikt Ivan Zakharyaschev <i...@altlinux.org> schrieb am So., 20. Dez. 2015 um 16:32 Uhr: Hello! I've been interested in hacking language-c library a bit for my needs. (If it turns out useful and successful, I'll tell about it.) And I've cloned the repo listed at https://hackage.haskell.org/package/language-c-0.4.7 , namely: http://code.haskell.org/language-c Apart from my special hacks, I've also fixed some typos and so on. But then I discovered that if I want to publish them on hub.darcs.net , I need a darcs-2 repo, and the initial one which I used for cloning is a darcs-1 repo. I could do the conversion to darcs-2, but I read that it is not reproducible: run several times on the same set of patches it will give different results. As I've discovered also a language-c repo at hub.darcs.net which looks like an upstream repo: http://hub.darcs.net/visq/language-c , I'm in doubt whether I should continue making my patches against the darcs-1 repo which is said to be upstream at hackage or against http://hub.darcs.net/visq/language-c whichis not officially declared as the upstream but looks more fresh. ..if I want to be able to send some of my patches upstream. Best regards, Ivan
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
