On Sun, 21 Aug 2016, Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
I'm afraid that what you are proposing is not possible with Darcs'
current internal representation of patches. Darcs handles patches in a
line-based way. So the problem is worse than computationnal cost.
I did not want to propose new patch types, just improved diff (for now).
Say I have
------
a
b
c
------
and alter it to
------
b
c
------
I guess that the record command would replace 'a' by ' b' and 'b' ' c' and
drop 'c' (the current patience diff might replace all lines at once). But
it would be more natural to drop 'a' and replace 'b' by ' b' and 'c' by '
c'.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
