Just to clear this up, we sorted it out in IRC. Nothing was wrong, the presets are just presets and not in the profiled denoise selector like hardcoded profiles.
Am Donnerstag, 3. September 2015, 18:43:03 schrieb Bernhard Stegmaier: > Hi, > > I am using darktable 1.6.8 (mainly on OS X but also on Linux) and I created > a custom noise profile for my (not-yet supported) EOS-M3 as described here: > http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/ > <http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/> > > gen-profile works fine (after I recognized that I have to use the tools of > the 1.6.x branch, otherwise only some for 1.6.8 useless json file is > generated…) and generates a presets.txt and a library.db. If I start > darktable via command line and point it to use the generated library.db > (like the scripts tells me to) it really uses it (it gets a new timestamp, > whereas the normal one in .config stays untouched). I also had a look into > the library.db using a sqlite GUI and my presets seem to be there… at > least, there are entries with something like “Canon EOS M3 iso 100” in the > name column, there are some 36byte BLOBs in some …_params columns, enabled > is set to “1”, but all other columns are empty (especially the model/maker > columns). The model name, etc. of presets.txt look identical to the ones > shown by darktable in photo information. > > However, the profile don’t show up in profiled denoise. > I tried using the new profiles on already imported photos as well as on > newly imported ones. > > Any idea why? > Anything else to debug this further? > I already tried starting with “-d all” but didn’t find anything useful > (well, I didn’t know where to look for, but at least the string “M3” or > “EOS” doesn’t show up anywhere indicating that e.g. the model names don’t > match). > > The first time I launched darktable with the library.db from the script it > wrote some messages to console that it updates something exactly of my new > profile entries (the entries of the script seem to have some wrong > version?). Maybe something going wrong here? > > > Regards, > Bernhard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
