Am Sonntag, 8. Mai 2016, 17:40:51 schrieb jmsarat: > Ok, it was just a wild guess. If DT is using its own color management > for export when lcms2 is not selected, what are the differences or > benefits of using lcms2?
It is faster, but somewhat limited, most obvious limitation is the lack of configurable rendering intent. And it doesn't work for all color profiles. For those not supported by our code we fall back to using lcms2. So the results _should_ be the same. If they aren't in your case that's probably a bug. > Jean-Marc > > Le 08/05/2016 à 16:08, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit : > > Am Sonntag, 8. Mai 2016, 15:54:28 schrieb jmsarat: > >> Hi Matthias, > >> > >> With a clean $HOME/.config/darktable, the option lcms2 is deactivated by > >> default therefore the export function use lcms1-1.19. > > > > That is a misunderstanding. darktable might use some internal functions > > instead of lcms2, but it will never use lcms1. > > > > [...] > > > > Tobias > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
