Hard to say what's going on without the XMP file, but it looks like you probably have an export style preset, given the presence of the watermark. Probably have an exposure module with a negative EV setting or something similar in that style. Maybe it's a setting of the watermark module itself.
Oh, and setting the display profile to sRGB in darktable doesn't do anything to change it for other applications e.g. Firefox. Also, firefox has several options to control color management which you might want to look into--it may not be behaving the way you think it is. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Seweryn Niemiec <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The difference is in brightness, when I watch the image in darkroom and > anywhere else, even in lighttable. It is so visible in shadows and > highlights, that any serious work in Darktable is impossible. > > Here are screenshots of the image as seen in Darktable, ImageMagick and > Firefox: > > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BwgeVbl9U4LoN0FVUlo2RjZIcVU&usp=sharing > > To simplify things, the image was exported as a JPG with colour space sRGB > and sRGB is the selected monitor profile in darkroom. > > What can be the cause of this problem? > > Darktable version: list+650~g2b2f6c2-dirty > > Best regards, > Seweryn > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > [email protected] > > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
