> Make sure that camera name in lensfun and in exiv and in dt's cameras.xml > match precisely. > I do not know what exif says, but cameras.xml says it should be: > Fujifilm XF1
I think I got it straightened out (the issue was on the SD-1100) > Custom base/tone-curve are overrated, and we do not have any means > to verify their validity, so we do not really merge those any more. I'll probably run with them anyhow, just for the learning experience, but thanks for the heads-up. >> (probably try for the zero/dead pixel correction in DT, extending the >> hot pixel module.) > No, hot pixel module does not need any per-camera calibration. Certainly! As far as I can tell, there's no dead-pixel correction in DT at all, i.e. interpolating out the identically-zero values in the RAW. Seems to make sense to start from the hotpixel module to implement that, although I could be missing something. > That camera should be basically supported, except: > 1. no raw sample on rawsamples.ch > 2. no wb presets > 3. no noise profile Yep, these were on the list to do as well (across all three cameras). The Fuji XF-1 has zilch lensfun support, though, so I intend to do that first. I'll then be following up here as I work on the DT-related aspects of the cameras...just mentioned them on the lensfun list in case anybody was interested. ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
