The Markesteijn process was adapted to darktable specifically for the
X-trans sensor some years ago and to my knowledge this procedure has
been fully successful. I am not sure what the filmic module has to do
with the demosaic process.
David
On 2019-01-26 12:02 p.m., Bruce Williams wrote:
Hi all,
I had a viewer write to me about the filmic module and which demosaic
algorithm to use.
Here's an excerpt from his email...
"But now I use only Fuji cameras, and for the RAW files (.RAF) from
Fuji X-trans sensors, the Demosaic module has only two options:
'method' and 'colour smoothing'. There's no 'match greens'. And the
'method' pulldown does not have AMaZE. Rather, it has VNG, Markesteijn
1-pass (the default), Markesteijn 3-pass, passthrough (monochrome),
and frequency domain chroma. This is the case in DT on both MacOS and
Debian."
He goes on to suggest that perhaps darktable reads the metadata from
the raw file and only presents appropriate demosaic algorithms for
that sensor type.
Is that the case?
And is there a recommended demosaic algorithm for the x-trans sensor?
Cheers,
Bruce Williams.
___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
