Hi, I've a question to those who have built metadata. I use the current 5 metadata fields. The first two ones, title and description are very specific to each image, but even if I have some images from other photographers in my database, most of them are mines. In the meta_data table, out of 120.000 records, I see my name 100.000 times. Not very interesting I'm afraid. So, instead of a table (image)id, key, value I would split this table in two, the metadata table themselves, (metadata)id, key, value (with id,key,value unique) and the metadata usage table (image)id, (metadata)id, with the same behaviour seen by the user. But my name would appear only 3 times, which seems enough to me. This may be, or not, a good idea. Could the authors give the pros and cons they see about the two solutions ? Thanks
___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org