Hi,
I've a question to those who have built metadata.
I use the current 5 metadata fields. The first two ones, title and description 
are very specific to each image, but even if I have some images from other 
photographers in my database, most of them are mines.
In the meta_data table, out of 120.000 records, I see my name 100.000 times. 
Not very interesting I'm afraid.
So, instead of a table (image)id, key, value I would split this table in two, 
the metadata table themselves, (metadata)id, key, value (with id,key,value 
unique) and the metadata usage table (image)id, (metadata)id, with the same 
behaviour seen by the user. But my name would appear only 3 times, which seems 
enough to me.
This may be, or not, a good idea.
Could the authors give the pros and cons they see about the two solutions ?
Thanks



___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to