Sorry, this was supposed to be reply to all.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
Von: Jochen Keil <jochen.k...@gmail.com>
Date: Do., 21. Nov. 2019, 19:11
Subject: Re: [darktable-dev] Bulk operations miss some images
To: <ha...@schwalm-bremen.de>


That's good to know! I will see if I can allocate some time to get an
isolated dev version running to see if I can still trigger the bug.

Until then I'll just patiently wait for my Christmas present :)

<ha...@schwalm-bremen.de> schrieb am Do., 21. Nov. 2019, 16:19:

> Yes, it's probably one of the race conditions that have been fixed for 3.0
> and won't be backported.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:07 PM +0100, "Jochen Keil" <
> jochen.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> I can confirm that I'm on 2.6.3.
>>
>> Here's some more information. If you need to know more, please let me
>> know.
>>
>> Btw, to my (untrained) eye this looks like a race condition or so..
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>>   Jochen
>>
>> $ darktable --version
>> this is darktable 2.6.3
>> copyright (c) 2009-2019 johannes hanika
>> darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org
>>
>> compile options:
>>   bit depth is 64 bit
>>   normal build
>>   SSE2 optimized codepath enabled
>>   OpenMP support enabled
>>   OpenCL support enabled
>>   Lua support enabled, API version 5.0.1
>>   Colord support enabled
>>   gPhoto2 support enabled
>>   GraphicsMagick support enabled
>>   OpenEXR support enabled
>>
>> Linux monolith Linux monolith 4.15.0-69-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6
>> 11:30:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> 4.15.0-69-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 11:30:24 UTC 2019 x86_64
>> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jochen Keil <jochen.k...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nicholas,
>>>
>>> I get my packages from here:
>>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/graphics:darktable:stable
>>>
>>> I wrote 2.6.0 because I wasn't sure about the version, but I did an
>>> update recently and I'm pretty sure I'm on 2.6.3. Sorry for the confusion.
>>>
>>> So, my bug report is still valid for 2.6.3. However, I might check at
>>> home tonight to verify that I'm really on 2.6.3.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:41 PM Nicolas Auffray <
>>> nicolas.auff...@zaclys.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The latest stable is 2.6.3 and we are on rc1 for next 3.0 stable. Many
>>>> things fixed since 2.6.0. So please update to 2.6.3 before.
>>>>
>>>> > Le 21 nov. 2019 à 08:24, Jochen Keil <jochen.k...@gmail.com> a écrit
>>>> :
>>>> >
>>>> > 
>>>> > Hello,
>>>> >
>>>> > I have a recurring problem with darktable (v2.6.0 - latest stable).
>>>> >
>>>> > I do a lot of bulk operations e.g. either by selecting all pictures
>>>> (hundreds, I use C+a)  and using "Paste All" with "overwrite" or by
>>>> applying a style.
>>>> >
>>>> > I noticed various different behaviors on some images (maybe 5-10 in
>>>> 1000).
>>>> >
>>>> > For some, the stack won't be copied at all or the style would not be
>>>> applied. For others, "overwrite" would not work and just append to the
>>>> existing stack.
>>>> >
>>>> > Both results are undesirable and hard to spot, especially because I
>>>> would like not to wait for the previews, but directly run a bulk export.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you,
>>>> >
>>>> >   Jochen
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>>> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
>>>> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>>>> > =
>>>>
>>>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
>> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>>
>

___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to