Good evening community, I have been using darktable for some years and I appreciate it for the cleanliness of the results and the power of the tools. However I happen to associate it with other development software. I write in sequence some suggestions that could greatly improve the usability of the software. - Manual version 3.0 - Fujifilm files are displayed without any correspondence with the jpeg sooc, even when this has been saved without special settings on the camera. Raw Therapee for example does not have this type of problem, since for each file it applies a different tonal curve ad-hoc, which uniforms the open file to the jpeg (sooc) obviously this equalization can be deactivated so as to obtain a "clean" raw file " Other software (such as lightroom C01 or ON1 for example, read the metadata present in the .raf file and reproduce the file almost exactly compared to the jpeg sooc already in the opening phase using the "AUTO" mode.
- The path panel for saving files takes the last path specified by the user; it would be useful to insert the possibility of being able to save in the path of the opening folder of the file you are working on. - The development modules are categorized according to a logical order of programming, not photographic editing, it would be interesting to be able to reorganize them according to their own work logic, at least when it comes to a user-defined workflow. - in the styles module it would be useful to be able to sort the saved styles by subcategories, so as not to create a huge list of styles that you have to scroll through every time - For the styles module, it would be useful to generate a popup with "mouse over" preview, which shows the preview of the photo being worked with with the set of settings applied Thanks for your attention. Lorenzo Fontanella ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
