On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Pascal de Bruijn <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Obry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Pascal,
>>
>>> You mean when copying the history stacks? Please elaborate a bit?
>>
>> Yes, copying the history stack.
>>
>>> White balance is an absolute corrrection IIRC, not relative... so it
>>> naturally doesn't transfer well between different images...
>>
>>> So for generic/artistic color correction, I'd highly recommend the
>>> color correction plugin (which has a warming filter preset for
>>> example).
>>
>> I'm not looking at an artistic look, really correcting the white balance
>> (as done in LR) to a set of pictures that are taken at the same time
>> under the same light. I correct the first one, when I'm pleased with the
>> WB correction I want to paste this same correction to other images.
>
> Ok. Do the numbers really turn up differently?
>
> I guess we should wait for hanatos to comment then :s

He will explain better, but to give some hint, the problem is that we
are normalizing the values to 5000, instead of calculating the WB
value of the image as shot, so the WB point is relative to each image.
Therefore, when you copy a value from one image to other, the value
doesn't really mean the same for the two.

IMHO, this has to be changed to show the actual "as shot" WB point value.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel

Reply via email to