On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Wolfgang Goetz <wolfgang.zt...@web.de> wrote: > johannes hanika wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Wolfgang Goetz >> <wolfgang.zt...@web.de> wrote: > ... >> > noise source is CMOS + DAC ...same hardware with or without the 'E' >> >> and the photons themselves. > > ;-) good to know that this little beasts don't look at their target. > > >> >> > to prove evidence: >> > when it comes to noise only D800 is referenced >> > in Nikon's D800_TechnicalGuide or dpreview: >> > Noise and Noise Reduction.. 'only' D800 in selectionlist >> > http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-d800-d800e/18 >> >> how is that evidence? > > they don't distinguish between E or not-E > when discussing noise.
yes, i see that.. so what exactly is the evidence ;) ? that can just mean they forgot or don't care or don't understand photon noise. i'm totally uncomfortable pushing this without having looked at a graph (at which point we might just as well push the correct data, if we profiled it already). j. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
