doesn't that very intuitively depend on the setting append/replace history stack in the `history stack' panel?
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Pascal Obry <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was expecting that the cloned image will have inherited/copied the > current iop but the style is applied to the original image. > > It makes more sense to clone with the iop because: > > - the inherited/copied iop can easily be disabled. > > - when you have spend time to remove spot from an image it > is a pain to have to redo the work on the cloned image. > > What do you think? > > -- > Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) > > The best way to travel is by means of imagination > > http://v2p.fr.eu.org > http://www.obry.net > > gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester > Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the > endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to > tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > darktable-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
