On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net> wrote:
>
> Jeremy,
>
> > it's the prefered way to do complicated customisations for your own
> > need, not to extend DT in general. This is of course a grey area.
> >
> > If a feature is needed by everybody it should be in core
> >
> > If a feature is only usefull for a particular workflow then it should be
> > written in lua
>
> Ok, in that case don't you those two features are for everybody? That's
> quite generic and general feature, no? As you said a grey area, hard to
> draw the frontier!
>
> Pascal.
>
no, here I think it's clearly a feature to customise DT to your particular
need, so it should be done in DT
let me explain a bit better what I meant above
* if a feature is meant to help people customize DT it should be done in lua
* if a feature is a feature of core DT then it should be don in the core
I have a clear idea in my head, but i'm not sure how to express it, tell me
if you are fine with the above, if not i'll try to reword
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
