On 2013-12-31 00:50, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
> Am 31.12.2013 04:07, schrieb Mark Heieis:
>> I did some looking around and found this from
>> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/201011/msg00043.html:
>>
>   > [ ... ]
>> Is there a reason why darktable using such an old version of saxon?
>>
> This is what the docbook saxon extensions require.

Curious that dt would still be using xslt 1.0 (Saxon 6.5.5 was released 
around 2005 and was last version to support 1.0) and docbook 6 (xslt 
2.0) was released somewhere around 2009. I guess the issue, for me at 
least, is that requiring an outdated xslt processor conflicts with 
standard, installed tool chains.Why would this not be updated along with 
the new release?


mrh.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel

Reply via email to