Here is one of the images I used (ISO 3200):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_HpnO6hbpJxUzJid082bi1lajQ/edit?usp=sharing
.
Thanks,
Rich
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Rich Renomeron <rrenome...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's an attempt at profiling a Canon SL1/100D. I'm not sure I did it
> right, as the graphs seem to drop off at 0.9. When I ran the benchmark,
> here's the PSNR values I got:
>
> iso100-denoised.pfm : 26.5876
> iso100.pfm : 26.4956
> iso200-denoised.pfm : 26.2869
> iso200.pfm : 25.9563
> iso400-denoised.pfm : 26.7674
> iso400.pfm : 26.0549
> iso800-denoised.pfm : 25.8421
> iso800.pfm : 24.6866
> iso1600-denoised.pfm : 25.1397
> iso1600.pfm : 23.243
> iso3200-denoised.pfm : 24.5426
> iso3200.pfm : 21.4517
> iso6400-denoised.pfm : 22.6141
> iso6400.pfm : 18.718
> iso12800-denoised.pfm : 21.0549
> iso12800.pfm : 16.2401
> iso25600-denoised.pfm : 18.1404
> iso25600.pfm : 13.7978
>
> Looks reasonable in that PSNR(denoised) > PSNR(noisy) for all ISOs. Are
> these presets reasonable? I have this camera until Thursday, so I can try
> again if the graphs look off.
>
> I used the profiling tools from current git master as of 1/11, and
> darktable 1.4 in the release PPA for Ubuntu 13.10.
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
