On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:32:00 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014, 14:38:21 schrieb Kevin: > > [..] > > I didn't have time to look at your patch, but if you want to have a chance > of seeing this included you have to remove > > > -i|--input <input file> > > > > -o|--output <output file> > > > > [-x|--xmp <xmp file>] > > and go back to the old behaviour. Maybe then I will take some time to review > it. And the --style is something I am also not convinced of. If you want > canned processing just put it into an XMP.
As requested I have removed the -i, -o and -x parameters. Almost. I'm still against positional parameters: they violate my view of the philosophy of Unix. So the attached file contains the following two patches: 1) cli_positional.patch - old style positional parameters only. 2) cli_both.patch - a mixture of both, file paths can be specified by positional parameters or by the -i, -o and -x parameters - but not both. This, IMO, represents an acceptable compromise. Existing scripts or patterns of usage will still operate correctly while there is the freedom to specify parameters in whatever order is desired. I have no such strong views regarding the "--style" parameter so there are to additional patches, each based of the above two that removes that parameter: 3) cli_positional_no_style.patch 4) cli_both_no_style.patch Kevin
cli_patch.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed-tar
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud. http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
