Hello Tobias, On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:38:47 +1100, Tobias Ellinghaus <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip] >> >> > The size difference is just because we manually (well, from the script >> > Togan mentioned) delete the usermanual's sources to get a reasonable >> > tarball size. The rest is the same. >> >> Why not have cmake do that? >> I would propose a patch if I had enough knowledge of cmake. I know we do >> it for hugin...produce a clean tarball that is. I'll have to have a look >> at how that is done. > > Why? Just leave the docs in there. Or build from the git checkout > directly. Well it does seem that the docs don't get included, even in some distro packages, and leaving them in there adds a hell of a lot to both the tarball and the src.rpm. I don't want to build from git directly, as I explained, I prefer to build rpms. > Even more complexity in our cmake system for no reason sounds like a bad > idea. I doubt very much that it adds anything significant to the complexity of the cmake system, but that's just my feeling. It is curious how a change that would remove the embuggerance of manually removing the docs is seen as a bad idea. OK, I'll leave at that, thanks for your help. Cheers, -- Regards, Terry Duell ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
