Am Samstag, 12. März 2016, 12:41:26 schrieb Pascal Obry: > Le samedi 12 mars 2016 à 12:19 +0100, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit : > > Did you also export pictures and sample the pixels? That might be > > more precise > > than relying on the video stack of a virtualization layer. > > Good question, I don't remember. I've done that but can't be sure for > all modules. > > > If that's the reason for the exposure scaling I think we should > > ignore it. > > Using exposure to compensate for unrelated changes is IMO very bad™. > > Frankly at this stage I don't really care if the exposure compensation > is taken as-is. In any case it is impossible to have a 100% correct > mapping. The exposure compensation here is very close to the Lr, so > using the Lr value will support the OP usage which is probably more > important than saving a click to adjust when important from Lr. > > All in all Tobias, if you agree I'll propose a patch.
Sure, go ahead, I can't test it anyway as I don't have Lr to compare. :-) > Cheers, Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
