You could do it selectively: reduce saturation of the brightest parts, or
vice versa: reduce brightness of saturated parts, or combine the two.
On 28 Mar 2016 20:16, "Michael Below" <[email protected]> wrote:

> PS: I just read up on the rendering intents. Looks like I got the
> "absolute" rendering intent wrong, but the "perceptive" one I used
> before that didn't help me either. Now I reduced color saturation of the
> flower head to 75% -- which is a shame, but it produces better sRGB
> output. Do you know a better solution than this?
>
> Cheers
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> Am Mo 28 Mär 2016 19:43:52 CEST
> schrieb Michael Below <[email protected]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wanted to send a quick image of a yellow flower to
> > someone (Persian Buttercup, Ranunculus asiaticus). Now I have noticed
> > severe posterization issues within the flower, it's just too yellow.
> > In sRGB it's widely out of gamut, and no matter what I try, the
> > different flower leaves are lost, much of it is exported as a uniform
> > yellow blob. In AdobeRGB, it's still mostly out of gamut, but the
> > shape of the leaves is kept intact on export. ProPhotoRGB has only
> > small areas out of gamut. This is not a matter of file formats, I
> > tried 16bit PNG as well as JPEG.
> >
> > I had the impression that I could use the rendering intent
> > colorimetric (absolute) to force an image into the desired output
> > color space. Somehow this doesn't work. Any idea how to do it right?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Michael
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> > darktable user mailing list
> > to unsubscribe send a mail to
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Michael Below
> Rechtsanwalt
> www.judiz.de
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> darktable user mailing list
> to unsubscribe send a mail to
> [email protected]
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]

Reply via email to