On Thursday 23 June 2016 14:38:37 Christian Mandel wrote: > Am 23.06.2016 um 13:54 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus: > > On Thursday 23 June 2016 13:07:11 Christian Mandel wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I wonder if the best/only/recommended method to correct this is still > >> using the geotagging module? > > > > Yes, as it's the only way. > > > >> Does the time shift propagate to the xmp > > > > No, and it probably never will. > > That's a pity. What's the reason? Is there another option on the horizon > or at least thinkable? > > Unfortunately your answer makes me more and more willing to alter the > date in the raw files. I know about the risks, but a big advantage of > the sidecar files is that I do not have to care about the database, I > could always reconstruct it from the xmp files*. But this answer breaks > this behaviour, doesn't it?
The request is quite old and I guess everyone agrees that having something only in database and not the XMP is bad. However, we haven't found a way to fix the issue. Details are here: https://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10569 > Best regards > > Chris > > > *Of course that does not hold for styles etc., but I think I remember > there was some consensus on the dev mailing list that this is a > misconception and will be replaced by a file-based system one day[TM]. > > >> and output exif meanwhile? > > > > Yes. It always did. > > > > [...] > > > >> Chris > > > > Tobias > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
