On sabato 26 novembre 2016 00:10:26 CET, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
Am Freitag, 25. November 2016, 23:51:52 CET schrieb Niccolò Belli:
On venerdì 25 novembre 2016 16:43:04 CET, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: ...
Looking at this part as an example:
eDP1 the X atom and colord returned different profiles
X atom: _ICC_PROFILE (2815280 bytes)
description: U2515H #1 2016-09-25 18-25 D6500 2.2 M-S
XYZLUT+MTX
The X atom mentioned should match the content shown, so
_ICC_PROFILE has the
profile U25...
The part that might be buggy is the mapping between
_ICC_PROFILE and eDP1. All
of these things lack either documentation or sample code how to
use it in the
real world without learning about several decades of X11 naming conventions
and nomenclature. It also seems to be undefined in the case that xrandr is
used.
The code of darktable-cmstest is here:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/src/cmstest/main.c
I fixed a potential bug in there recently, maybe try compiling
it standalone
(see comment in the top of the file for how) and check if it
shows a different
result.
Still no luck with very latest git version.
$ darktable-cmstest
darktable-cmstest version 2.2.0rc1+28~g59b6cbe
this executable was built with colord support enabled
darktable itself was built with colord support enabled
eDP1 the X atom and colord returned different profiles
X atom: _ICC_PROFILE (2815280 bytes)
description: U2515H #1 2016-09-25 18-25 D6500 2.2 M-S
XYZLUT+MTX
colord: "(none)"
description: (file not found)
DP1-1 the X atom and colord returned the same profile
X atom: _ICC_PROFILE_1 (0 bytes)
description: (none)
colord: "(none)"
description: (file not found)
DP1-8 the X atom and colord returned the same profile
X atom: _ICC_PROFILE_2 (0 bytes)
description: (none)
colord: "(none)"
description: (file not found)
Niccolò Belli
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
