On jeudi 6 juillet 2017 14:16:29 CEST Аl Воgnеr wrote: > Am Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:51:27 +0200 (...) > http://lensfun.sourceforge.net/development/ > The source code is available from a git repository hosted at (...) > > I assume these git-files are here: > https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/tree/master/data/db > > But the files there are not from the last days, but months old. > The last commit to that branch was done 27 days ago. The older files stay there as they are still needed as part of the complete database.
> So is this not the development brunch of lensfun? > "Development branch" does not mean "all files change all the time". It only means "new code/data can get added here at any time and we don't guarantee stability or absence of bugs". Also, typically only a few contributors can modify the depository (checking in new files, creating or merging branches). And in most open source projects, even those people are volunteers and might have other things to do. So a last commit 27 days ago in what is a fairly stable library isn't all that surprising. And typically, as an end used you don't want to pull from a development branch, unless you really know what you are doing. Although in this specific case (pulling a lens or camera xml file from a development branch) breaking lensfun isn't all that likely. > > http://lensfun.sourceforge.net/lenslist/ > Before you start to calibrate new lenses or report missing cameras > please check http://wilson.bronger.org/lensfun_coverage.html for a > daily updated list covering the status of the current development > version. That list can easily be generated every night by an automated script. So the list is new, but that doesn't mean that there are new cameras or lenses added every day. ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
