Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2018, 19:20:52 CET schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
> Am 04.01.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
> > Am 04.01.2018 um 18:59 schrieb François Patte:
> >> Bonjour,
> >> 
> >> I just tried to experiment gimp 2.9 (development version): openning a
> >> raw file opens darktable and once you have finish to treat your photo in
> >> darktable, closing darktable imports the photo in gimp... Ok.
> >> 
> >> But the result I had was awful: the image is to bright, without contrast
> >> and the saturation is bad... A part of the treatment done in darktable
> >> is to be done again....
> >> 
> >> Does someone experienced the same problem?

Thank you for reporting!

> >> Thank you.
> > 
> > I can confirm. The resulting images in gimp are too bright and not
> > saturated enough. They look a.ot different then in darkroom.
> > 
> > I tested with RAW from different cameras. All behave the same.
> > 
> > May be an import bug in gimp.  ?
> > 
> > Matthias
> > 
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > __ darktable user mailing list
> > to unsubscribe send a mail to
> > [email protected]
> It is weird.
> 
> I import CR2 with gimp-2.9.8. gimp starts DT. in DT I export to file which
> gives a much too dark(!) image. When I exit DT the image given to gimp is
> mucht too bright(!).

The problem was that darktable was exporting as sRGB. GIMP then interpreted 
the file as linear data so the lightness of pixels was off. That was a bug in 
darktable which should be fixed now.

> Also, DT siwtches export color profile to linear-rec-709-RGB. But changing
> it to anything other than that, like sRGB,  has no influence on the
> resulting image in gimp

darktable defaults to linear Rec709 when called from GIMP. You could select 
some other *linear* profile in the export module on lighttable. That just 
didn't work due to a bug.

> Matthias

Tobias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to