That change did not create any new behavior, but instead restored the
behavior from before version 2.4.0. See https://github.com/darktable-o
rg/darktable/pull/1662 for the rationale behind it.

Why would using, e.g., 'Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|
Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae%' not work for you in this case?

--
August Schwerdfeger
[email protected]

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:03 AM, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'm a bit disappointed by the changed treatment of subtags in collections
> which is labelled a "Bugfix" in 2.4.3:
>
>    When collecting by tags, don&#8217;t select subtags
>
> (the corresponding commit is 7428d2e0484d8727eca8a9a8e7cdbf53eb6b44e2).
>
> To me, the previous behaviour was a feature and not a bug.  Assume that
> you're
> very geeky about tagging your pictures of animals and have pictures of two
> geckos
> in your collection
>
>   Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|
> Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae|Hemidactylus|Hemidactylus frenatus
>   Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|
> Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae|Phelsuma|Phelsuma borbonica
>
> Previously, you could collect
>
>   Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|
> Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae
>
> and find the pictures of all geckos.  Since 2.4.3 one has to logically OR
> all subtags.
> In the example of the two gecko species, this is not a big deal, but if
> you want all
> pictures of birds from a specific year, it gets very tedious.
>
> Am I missing something or is there a chance to revert this change?
> --
> Thorsten Ohl, Wuerzburg Univ., Physics -- http://physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
> /ohl
> ____________________________________________________________
> ________________
> darktable user mailing list
> to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscribe@lis
> ts.darktable.org
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]

Reply via email to