Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2018, 19:48:43 CEST schrieb Germano Massullo: > Answering in line > > Il 05/03/18 19:31, Dave Pawson ha scritto: > > Are you saying it is a valid repo to add? For Fedora? > > Do you mean the darix's OpenSUSE repository for darktable/Fedora? I > don't know, I have never used it. I know that darix is very skilled in > his work, but Fedora darktable is very complete and the packaging > activity has been done at my best possibilities. darktable developers > and I, we even managed to change Fedora packaging guidelines [1] to > better "fit" them to darktable code.
And at least I want to thank you for the support! That also applies to darix of course, and all the other packagers. We as darktable devs only provide source code when releasing, all the packages people use in the end are done by highly motivated individuals – or people that were motivated enough to automate the process. :-) > The only missing thing I am working on, is > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571932 > > [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972604#c32 > > Actually I am also going to release darktable 2.4.x on EPEL7, the > repository that serves CentOS and RHEL. > I am only waiting for CentOS 7.5 to be released, then I could push it to > EPEL7 stable. > > >> Considering that I always provide timely darktable updates since years, > >> and I have always worked on maintaining this package spending my spare > >> time, I am a bit disappointed in reading previous statements. > > > > For which, thank you. I read the earlier comment and (wrongly) > > expected an imminent F27 release. > > No problem :-) Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
