Le 19/05/2018 à 10:48, Lorenzo Bolzani a écrit :
> Just work on the jpeg. As you say, this file is never modified so there
> is no quality loss depending on how many times you "edit" it, in the
> same session or multiple sessions.
> 
> Converting a jpeg to a lossless format before editing will give you zero
> advantages.
> 
> When you export the file to a lossy format, like jpeg, there is a very
> small loss of quality. If you use a high quality setting during the
> export this loss will be so small to be practically none (especially if
> your original file was already compressed). If you really do not want
> this minimal loss export to png.
> 
> The only case where you may want a lossless format is this: you open the
> file in DT, do some edits, export. Then open this exported file with
> gimp (or something else) and do some more edits. Now save with gimp and
> open the result with DT and do some more edits with DT. In this case
> there will be a very small difference if you use a lossless (png) format
> to "share" the edited file. In this scenario, in theory, using a huge 16
> bit tiff file is even better but if your workflow starts with an 8-bit
> jpeg there is a minimal advantage in "adding bits" later (more or less
> depending on the specific image).

Thank you for this clear answer.

Another question: is there a way to include the xmp data in a file while
exporting, for gimp seems to be unable to read a separate .xmp file
associated to an image file?

Thank you.

>     Bonjour,
> 
>     If you open a jpeg photo in darktable, you can modify it (exposition,
>     contrast, etc.). As far as I understand the way dt works, the jpeg file
>     is not modified but all changes are recorded in the xmp file and a new
>     jpeg file is created when you export your photo at the end of the
>     treatment (am I right?).
> 
>     So my question is: is there some loss when I export the photo to a jpeg
>     file after treatment with dt and is there a cumulative loss of quality
>     if I reopen the original jpeg with dt (not the exported one) in order to
>     add or modify some module actions?
> 
>     What is the best strategy to work with dt on jpeg photos? Work directly
>     with the jpeg format or convert this one to another lossless format
>     (using imagemagick for instance) and work with this format before
>     exporting to the jpeg format?
> 
>     I expect that what I say is enough understandable....
> 
>     Thank you.
> 
>     -- 
>     François Patte
>     UFR de mathématiques et informatique
>     Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
>     Université Paris Descartes
>     45, rue des Saints Pères
>     F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
>     Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822
>     http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
>     <http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte>
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> [email protected]


-- 
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to