Hello, http://lclevy.free.fr/cr2/ For EOS 500D (alias EOS Rebel Kiss X3):
Sensor width / height : 4832 x 3204 Left and top border: 72 31 4832 - 72 = 4760 3204 - 31 = 3173 So replacing this line in rawspeed/data/camera.xml (EOS 500D) <Crop x="62" y="30" width="4722" height="3142"/> with this one: <Crop x="72" y="31" width="4760" height="3173"/> fixed the issue. > ---------------------------------------- > From: Jeepeii Jagesh <jeep...@mailfence.com> > Sent: Sat Jul 07 18:02:56 CEST 2018 > To: Timur Irikovich Davletshin <timur.davlets...@gmail.com>, > <darktable-user@lists.darktable.org> > Subject: Re: [darktable-user] CR2 cropped compared to JPEG > > > Thanks Timur, > > In the case of EOS 500D, the camera JPEG is wider than RAW. > I've try few software displaying CR2 file correctly: > rawtherapee > nufRaw > geeqie > digicam > aftershot > photivo > I'd like to understand the issue with darktable. > Would be great to fix this. > > Jeepei > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: Timur Irikovich Davletshin <timur.davlets...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Sat Jul 07 07:50:54 CEST 2018 > > To: <darktable-user@lists.darktable.org> > > Subject: Re: [darktable-user] CR2 cropped compared to JPEG > > > > > > On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 23:57 +0200, Jeepeii Jagesh wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I use a Canon EOS 500D, shot in RAW + JPEG. > > > https://we.tl/11IDm9G2Yh > > > In lighttable, the files display the same resolution 4752 x 3168. > > > Opening the CR2 image in darkroom, it goes to 4832 x 3204. > > > But it's cropped, down and right by + -30px. > > > On Rawtherapee I don't have the problem. > > > How can that be fixed? > > > > > > Thanks > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > > _______ > > > darktable user mailing list > > > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscribe@lists.darkta > > > ble.org > > > > > > > I've addressed similar issue not so long ago, so here is what I've got > > as reply: > > > > Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2018, 20:55:20 CEST schrieb Timur Irikovich > > Davletshin: > > > Question just out of my natural curiosity. Just noticed that > > darktable > > > always produces pictures that are 30-50 pixels smaller when exporting > > > from DNG than from camera Raw file. And even more, they never match > > > claimed camera resolution. Biggest difference is on EOS 5D Mark III. > > > > > > E.g. It claims 5920x3950 in DT image information but exported picture > > > is (from CR2) 5794x3868 and (from DNG) 5760x3840. Nikon files show > > the > > > same. > > > > > > At least in case of Adobe's converted files there is some logic that > > > they always match builtin JPGs in size. > > > > > > Remember I disabled all default modules (just 'original' in history > > > stack), DNGs produced from Raw are not demosaiced (latest version of > > > Adobe's tool with default settings). > > > > No idea what Adobe does to the DNG files, but at least camera raw files > > have > > (in general) some black borders and otherwise broken areas at the edges > > that > > we cut off. Therefore the exported image size doesn't match the raw > > file size > > 1:1. Camera JPEGs are a little smaller as they try to adhere to the > > advertised > > aspect ratio and probably cut off more to err on the safe side (and > > make the > > in-camera processing easier). > > > > > Did I miss something? > > > > > > Thanks for explanation in advance, > > > > > > Timur. > > > > Tobias > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > darktable user mailing list > > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
