Kneops (2019-May-19, excerpt): > I just noticed this and I wonder how I can prevent this, or perhaps their is > a good reason for this? It will probably not make the size of a jpeg much > larger, but it just doesn't seem to be information that needs to go into a > jpeg.
For all images I hand out, I try to exercise special care to scrub all unnecessary metadata, i.e., delete really everything not really needed. I forget this most of the time. To be consistent, you'll need to script this. It's a good thing that darktable is able to add this data, in case you might need it. But it also is a path for information to leak out, and the "normal" user might not know it. For commercial use, I'd be especially careful: There have been famous cases of journalists giving away the location of a source through metadata in a photograph. -- http://stefan-klinger.de o/X I prefer receiving plain text messages, not exceeding 32kB. /\/ \ ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
