____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
The combination of iMatch and DarkTable is currently my preferred
replacement of LightRoom 6 (perpetual licence). Experienced iMatch
users are advising me that any and all metadata changes that I wish to
make to my images should be performed in iMatch, not in DarkTable. What
DT functionality do I lose if I follow this advice? What does DT write
into the 'filename.raw.xmp' file - a file type that iMatch cannot
understand because it is not covered by the agreed metadata structure
and content standards (so I am told). Why cannot DT write to the usual
.xmp sidecar files?
- [darktable-user] Are their potential probelms when using i... tony Hamilton
- Re: [darktable-user] Are their potential probelms whe... Guillermo Rozas
- Re: [darktable-user] Are their potential probelms... Terry Pinfold
- Re: [darktable-user] Are their potential prob... Jozef Dassen
