On Sun, Sep 20, 2020, at 04:05, Dakin White wrote: > > I can do this but would like to check one thing. If this same issue is > occurring in Digikam also ie. lens name = "173", would this not > indicate the issue is not Darktable?
It indicates that they both use a reasonable method of getting the information from exiv2, which usually works, but can fail in some cases where there may be another method that would return a useful string... so it's not so much an *issue* with either software, but more of a request to investigate the possibility of adding additional fallback attempts to handle this case. There's a fair amount of that going on already, as seen here: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/b2995917b067bf703c2ac46e6e954fe5f1e224a8/src/common/exif.cc#L983 -- jys ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
