Gian,

 

Good to hear that.  And yes I expect that that XEON processor will surely help 
(*).

 

GPU performance can be further boosted by optimization of the opencl settings 
in file darktablerc.  You can read about that in the darktable manual.  

 

But possibly adequate parameters for a nvidia gtx 1650 can be found in this 
thread: 

https://discuss.pixls.us/t/darktable-opencl-performance-with-nvidia-gtx1650-super/19965/17
 as follows

opencl_async_pixelpipe=true

opencl_avoid_atomics=false

opencl_mandatory_timeout=200

opencl_memory_headroom=1024

opencl_memory_requirement=2048

opencl_micro_nap=10

opencl_number_event_handles=1000

opencl_scheduling_profile=very fast GPU

opencl_size_roundup=16

opencl_synch_cache=false

opencl_use_cpu_devices=false

opencl_use_pinned_memory=false

 

I gained like 3 to 6 times better interactive response time for pictures with 
about 25 to 30 modules activated, by tuning these parameters on my GPU close to 
these values.

 

Further I also have put opencl_synch_cache=true.  If that doesn’t penalize 
general response time too much, it gives the advantage of better response when 
reviewing/finetuning module parameters further in a 2nd pass even with “denoise 
profiled” activated. That’s typical for my workflow.

 

Regards,

Marc.

 

(*) But I am not an expert, since I use dt only since 6 months on an 
off-the-shelve overconfigured pseudo-gaming laptop from the MSI Creator series 
that I bought after my dual core I7 Acer laptop died.

 

 

Van: GianLuca Sarto [mailto:[email protected]] 
Verzonden: vrijdag 20 november 2020 13:30
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [darktable-user] Tone equaliser and response time during 
zooming/panning on 4K display (dt 3.2.1-Windows 10)

 

Marc,

 

thank you very much for your warning!

 

As you see, the first step is done, and I can see a huge improvement in 
browsing through the lighttable with the GTX 1650.

 

I was wondering too if it is worth to go to 4K, I wouldn't like to go back to 
square one, performance wise.

 

Maybe 2560x1440 is the wise compromise, and I save a lot of money: I do not 
really feel constraint at 1920x1200, I was suffering more for the slow paging.

 

In the next few days I should receive a second hand Xeon E3, that might boost 
further the overall performance.

 

-Gian

 

 

On 20/11/20 12:53, Marc Cabuy wrote:

Gian-Luca,

 

Just a little warning about purchasing a 4K display.  You indeed will need a 
good GPU. But still there is (or are) module(s) that are fully cpu-bound. 
That’s the case with tone equaliser. Interactive response when zooming and 
panning in the darkroom may suffer from poor response time on a 4K display 
(3840x2160) when you have a tone equaliser module activated in the module 
stack.  That’s my experience with dt 3.2.1 for Windows on my 16mp pictures. 
That issue is not existing that much on my WQHD display (2560x1440) or almost 
not on a HD display  (1920x1080). 

 

I repeat: it’s experience with dt 3.2.1 for Windows. I am not aware on how it 
behaves on Linux.

 

 

Marc 

 

 

Van: GianLuca Sarto <mailto:[email protected]> 
Verzonden: zondag 15 november 2020 21:30
Aan: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
Onderwerp: Re: [darktable-user] Ubuntu 20.04, OpenCL, DT3.2.1, Radeon HD5400

 

thanks, Šarūnas,

 

I have two Darktable systems, based on Lenovo TS140, one with AMD, the 

other with Nvidia Quadro 400.

Neither of the two manage OpenCL..

 

0.039390 [opencl_init] found opencl runtime library 'libOpenCL'

0.039412 [opencl_init] opencl library 'libOpenCL' found on your system 

and loaded

0.042560 [opencl_init] found 1 platform

0.042582 [opencl_init] found 1 device

0.042727 [opencl_init] device 0 `Quadro 400' has sm_20 support.

0.042778 [opencl_init] discarding device 0 `Quadro 400' due to 

insufficient global memory (511MB).

0.042784 [opencl_init] no suitable devices found.

0.042788 [opencl_init] FINALLY: opencl is NOT AVAILABLE on this system.

 

I would like to upgrade one of the two systems to a 4K display, so was 

already decided to purchase a new video card.

 

Is there a tested solution that works out of the box, or a list of DT 

OpenCL compliant cards for Linux?

 

 

 

On 15/11/20 15:34, Šarūnas wrote:

> On 11/14/20 3:41 PM, GianLuca Sarto wrote:

>> Hello All,

>> 

>> DT 3.2.1 here, running on Ubuntu 20.04, Radeon HD5400.

>> 

>> OpenCL should be working, however DT complains "could not get platforms"

>> (see below).

> Support for Radeon HD5xxx may have ended with fglrx (Ubuntu 16.04?).

> 

> You may check what is currently supported,

> by proprietary AMDGPU-PRO:

> https://www.amd.com/en/support

> 

> by open source ROCm:

> https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm#Hardware-and-Software-Support

> 

 

____________________________________________________________________________

darktable user mailing list

to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 

 

 


____________________________________________________________________________ 
darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to 
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>  

 


____________________________________________________________________________ 
darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to 
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>  


____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]

Reply via email to