Hallöchen! Kevin writes:
> This may be of interest (from > http://photo.net/learn/digital-photography-workflow/color-management/color-settings/ > ) > > "For example, if you use Lightroom or Aperture for processing your > camera raw files, you don’t need to select a general editing space > as you do with Photoshop. Instead, you select the appropriate > print profile during the printing process, a different editing > space when exporting photos for the Web or inclusion in a printed > piece and still another ICC profile when compositing photos in > Photoshop. This adds flexibility to your workflow. As camera raw > processing and the selective editing capabilities of raw > processors progresses, you may only have to choose an ICC profile > in the export and printing process." You cite this because it suggests that there should be no user-selected colour space before exporting/printing an image? Another sentence on this page is interesting: "When working with Pro Photo RGB there are many possible color values that lie well outside the sRGB color space and are impossible to see on a standard monitor. This means that when working in ProPhoto RGB, photographers are making edits to colors they cannot see. Unless one is accustomed to making subtle color edits “by the numbers”, it is difficult to take full advantage of the larger color gamut ProPhoto RGB offers." This supports my view that the histogram ("by the numbers") should be independent of the monitor. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: [email protected] or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
