Dear Colleagues,

I refer to the discussion on the above topic on this digest, Issues 26 
to 29, the discussion driven by Jeremy Rosen, Thouks, Pascal and a 
number of others. As requested by some partners in the discussion, I 
have (at last) posted some images at the following site:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3n1gmle42s6p5cd/vV967SzKGO?lst

I uploaded a few of the original raw images, as well as the accompanying 
dt XMP files and one or two JPG exports for these images. What they have 
in common is not that the images are good, but that they were taken in 
various degrees of challenging situations, most of them with little 
light and at moderate to high ISO settings. Images 8282 and  7882 are 
silhouette-like, taken against a cloudy sky in the rain and with a 
moving subject and no opportunity to adapt before taking the shots, any 
photographic parameters according to these conditions. I normally set 
the camera to the general light conditions of the general environment, 
but often the encounters with subjects are so brief that any other 
settings are impossible. So they really qualify as "snapshots". Most of 
these types of photographs need post processing to turn them into 
something that is interpretable. Grain is often a serious problem with 
these types of photographs. I have a thing about sharpness, but with 
these types of shots increasing the sharpness normally brings about 
unacceptable levels of grain. Most types of increase in exposure, e.g. 
exposure tool or base curve also brings about much more grain. 
Photograph 8282 is possibly one of the most difficult types of shots I 
am sometimes forced to take. [This is one of the world's rarest monkeys, 
photographed high up in a forest canopy in Cameroon]. The photo 
"31_Preuss's red colobus.jpg" has some bright-red pixels that appear 
when exporting the JPG. I am convinced this is a software artifact, and 
nothing to do with the CCD of the Canon 7D camera. Does anyone have any 
comments on which type of post-processing will reveal sufficient detail 
in theses difficult shots but which avoids high grain levels or other 
pixilated artifacts?

Fundamentally one cannot create an picture with information that is not 
already contained in the source image. Sometimes I thin I am trying to 
extract more than which really is available.

Thank you for your time.
Kind regards,
Willem






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to