Am 10.03.2013 18:34, schrieb Pascal de Bruijn: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Pascal Obry <[email protected]> wrote: >> Le 10/03/2013 15:46, Patrick Shanahan a écrit : >>> Perhaps a workable solution would be to present the automagick results and >>> allow <user> to select or alter ...?? >> >> I've not followed the whole discussion, but it is already possible to >> select manually the body and lens in the lens correction module. Right? > > There are cases where this fails as discussed earlier. >
Right. The possibility to override automatic detection is already implemented. OK, it's a nuisance that you first need to select the camera before you have all lenses presented. But that's not the biggest issue. The key problem as of today is an automatic detection that is way off and which the user fails to observe. A few ideas: 1) we could go back to the strict search rules. A lens would only be accepted from the database if there is an exact match. 2) we could add a second cross-check (maybe Levenshtein) of the found lens with the EXIF string. If the two differ too much (*) we reject the found profile and fall back to manual selection. (*) what distance is acceptable needs to be found out by experiment and experience Ulrich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
